During the 1960’s,
food became a form of youth culture and resistance. People begin moving away
from the typical meat-and-potatoes dinner to more natural and organic foods. This
is apparent when Belasco explains how upset he could make his roommates by “leaving
the meat out of the lasagna, injecting the roast beef with red dye, or serving
octopus instead of tuna salad.” He then continues by adding, “In 1970, my wife
and I met our first macrobiotic, who seemed irritatingly self-righteous and
mystical; but soon we too turned vegetarian and came to appreciate the
provocative power of refusing steak at the family dinner table” (Belasco). In
the Ruth Reichl book, she explains how she simply wanted that sense of
belonging and how food became a part of her culture. She wanted to be a good
cook in order to gain social acceptance. She wanted a niche, but she already
had a humorous friend and a beautiful friend, so cooking was her only other
option. Belasco then shows how the culture of food had changed worldwide. He
explains that “eating is more than just a private, physiological act; it
connects us to people and places all over the world – past, present, and future”
(Belasco). Ruth also experiences a similar adjustment in culture due to food. Ruth
initially shows some resistance when she refuses to go to France because she
just wanted to be normal and work at Dairy Queen. However, she eventually
agrees to move to France and upon arrival, she notices how her outlook on food
has changed. She has begun seeking out new foods and ingredients to incorporate
into her diet and cooking. Food became a part of her culture. Another common occurrence
during this time period is the sense of temptation and the act of over
indulging. Teenagers are always dealing with this sense of temptation and over indulgence.
One example that Ruth refers to is devil’s food cake, which is very tempting
and people tend to over indulge when eating it. Devil’s food cake embodies the culture
of the time period.
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
"Out of the Kitchen, Onto the Couch"
American’s are becoming
increasingly fascinated with cooking shows, while cooking in the home is on the
decline. Michael Pollan, the author of the article “Out of the Kitchen, Onto
the Couch,” argues that “it has been easier for us to give up cooking than it
has been to give up watching it.” He continues to make his point by adding that
“watching other people cook is not exactly a new behavior for us humans. Most
of us have happy memories of watching our mothers cooking in the kitchen.” The
typical American has nearly eliminated cooking in their everyday life;
according to Pollan, “the average American spends a mere 27 minutes a day on
food preparation and another 4 minutes cleaning up. This suggests that a great
many Americans are spending considerably more time watching images of cooking
on television than they are cooking themselves.” This is occurring in virtually
all American households so much so that the definition of “cooking” had to be
adjusted. Harry Balzer of the NPD Group “noticed that the definition of cooking
held by his respondents had grown so broad as to be meaningless, so the firm
tightened up the meaning. To cook means to prepare a main dish that requires
some degree of ‘assembly of elements.’ Microwaving a pizza doesn’t count as
cooking, but washing a head of lettuce and pouring bottled dressing over it
does” (Pollan). The shift in American culture has been attributed to our
fascination with cooking shows. This is due in large part to Erica Gruen, the
cable executive often credited with putting the Food Network on the map. It was
her understanding that “people don’t watch television to learn things. So she
shifted the network’s target audience form people who love to cook to people
who love to eat” (Pollan). Many of today’s cooking shows also utilize
ingredients which contain a combination of other ingredients. Pollan claims
that “canned soups, jarred mayonnaise, frozen vegetables, powdered sauces,
vanilla wafers, limeade concentrate, and Marshmallow Fluff” are all
“ingredients” used in many of today’s cooking shows. Many ads on the Food
Network also shy away from cooking in the home. These “food-related ads hardly
ever hawk kitchen appliances or ingredients.” They tend to “push the usual
supermarket cart of edible foodlike substances, including Manwich sloppy joe in
a can, Special K protein shakes and Ore-Ida frozen French fries, along with
fast-casual eateries like Olive Garden and Red Lobster” (Pollan). They
advertise cooking with already assembled products that you only have to heat or
mix. These shows and advertisements provide us with more satisfaction than the
actual task of cooking. It is easy to see why this fascination with cooking
shows is driving Americans out of the kitchen.
References:
Pollan, Michael. "Out of the Kitchen, Onto the
Couch." New York Times. 2 Aug 2009: MM26. Web. 13 Nov. 2012.
<http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/02/magazine/02cooking-t.html>.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)